How do you test a product video before paying for a full shoot?
Summary: sarah wilson discusses strategies for testing a product video with minimal resources before committing to a full shoot. They suggest creating rough cuts with different opening shots to convey the product's features, such as a collapsible travel mug. Viewers should watch one version at a time to understand their perceptions and insights. This process helps in identifying effective shots and deciding on necessary footage to film. The author also inquires if founders have similar experiences or have used rough clips in final edits.
A small team can spend half a day editing a launch video before anyone asks the obvious question: if you’ve never seen this product before, would you understand why it exists?
Say you’re launching a collapsible travel mug. You could open on the mug at full size and show it folding down. Or you could start with it already folded beside a set of keys, then show it opening. Both versions explain the same feature, but they ask the viewer to notice different things. The first shows how the mug works. The second gives you a sense of how little space it takes up.
Make two rough cuts before writing the shot list
I’d start with two six-second clips. Keep the caption, background, and end card the same. Change the opening shot and the direction of the action. If the caption says “Folds flat” in one version and “Fits in your bag” in the other, you’ll have a hard time telling whether the picture or the wording made the difference.
MiniMax H3 is one way to sketch those sequences from still images. You can supply a starting image and, if useful, an ending frame. For the mug, I’d photograph both states from the same angle and use those photos as reference points. If the generated clip invents a hinge or makes the cup collapse in a way the real one can’t, I’d replace that shot with a phone recording before showing it to anyone. Otherwise, people may respond to a feature you can’t actually ship.
Ask what they saw
Show one version to each person before letting them compare the two. If everyone sees both clips back to back, the second clip gets the benefit of whatever they worked out from the first.
After one viewing, ask, “What would you tell a friend this product does?” If someone says, “It looks like a travel mug with a nice lid,” ask what they noticed first. Maybe the lid catches the light while the folding action happens too low in the frame. If they say, “It folds down so I can fit it in a small bag,” ask which moment made that clear. Their answer can tell you what to keep when you reshoot.
A few conversations can help you spot a confusing shot. For example, if several people understand that the mug folds but can’t tell how small it gets, try showing it next to a familiar object. That’s a specific change you can try before you spend money on a shoot.
Decide what needs to be filmed
For the mug, I’d film the actual folding action in one continuous shot and keep the hand in frame. A jump cut at the moment the mug collapses hides the part a buyer might want to see. I’d also film the folded mug going into a real bag pocket if that’s the claim in the caption.
Once those shots are clear, the team can make a narrower decision about the budget. Does the launch need a styled hero shot, or does the phone footage already explain the product well enough for the landing page?
For founders who make launch videos in-house, what do you check before booking a shoot? Have you ever kept a rough phone clip in the final edit because it explained the product better than the polished version?